DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001453419-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-01-22

000010761

Contested design: 001453419-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested Registered Community design No 001453419-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 001453419-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Högert Technik GmbH

Germany (DE)

Pariser Platz 6a, 10117 Berlin, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Grupa Topex Sp. z o.o. Sp. k.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Pograniczna 2/4, 02-285 Warszawa, Polen

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

equipped tool case / socket set

shengketools.com, Item# 121111A 111pcs 1/4 · shengketools.com · disclosed 2014-08-15

Catalog

equipped tool case / socket set

SANT Manufacturer Ningbo Shengke Tools Co., Ltd 2014/2015 product catalog · SANT Manufacturer Ningbo Shengke Tools Co., Ltd · disclosed 2014-12-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on prior online and catalog disclosures of a nearly identical equipped tool case.
  • The holder argued the prior evidence was untranslated, not proven disclosed to EU circles before the grace period, and in any event the contested design created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the website and catalog as sufficiently reliable disclosures, found them publicly accessible before 16 February 2015, and held the grace-period defence inapplicable to third-party disclosures.
  • Comparing the overall appearance of the equipped cases, the Division found only minor differences and concluded the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.0108.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000010760

vs GTX Poland Sp. z o.o. Sp. k.

2019-01-22REUD invalidated03, 089
000131944

vs Jinsong Liu

2026-04-29REUD invalidated086
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidated036
000128615

vs Yami Zhongchuang (wenzhou) Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-07REUD invalidated086
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidated036
000128757

vs Axue Jin

2026-03-11REUD invalidated086
000127279

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidated086
000127244

vs KNIPEX-WERK C. Gustav Putsch KG

2026-03-05REUD invalidated086