DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004014736-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-03-19

000104139

Contested design: 004014736-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. Il disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 004014736-0001 è dichiarato nullo. Il titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dal richiedente, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mou Limited

United Kingdom (GB)

32 Woodstock Grove, W12 8LE Londra, Regno Unito

Represented by

Luca Guidobaldi

Holder · RCD owner

Maros S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via P. Togliatti, 27, 50008, Signa (FI) Italia

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCDD1

ankle boot

RCD No. 001123483-0001

Registered RCDD2

ankle boot

RCD No. 001123483-003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2009-05-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCDs D1 and D2 for ankle boots, stressing the same upper shape, shaft cut, outsole structure, lining contrast, and prominent visible stitching.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found D2 had been disclosed before the filing date; although the contrasting stitch colour meant the designs were not identical, that difference did not change the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The contested RCD lacked individual character, so the invalidity application was upheld and the holder was ordered to bear EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberJosé Antonio GARRIDO OTAOLA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.0432.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028