DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001733239-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-06-05

000010607

Contested design: 001733239-0003

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 001733239-0003 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Switchlab Inc.via PDF extraction

Taiwan (TW)

8F., No. 66, Zhongzheng Rd., Xinzhuang Dist. New Taipei City 24243, Republic of China (Taiwan)

Holder · RCD owner

WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

Germany (DE)

Patentabteilung / Fr. Burt, Hansastr. 27, 32423 Minden, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

earlier registered Community design for a Leiterplattenklemme

GGM Nr. 001691577-0001 · Blatt für Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster · disclosed 2010-04-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(a)Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 6Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant argued the registered views did not clearly show a protectable product appearance, the design concerned an invisible component of a complex product, and it lacked individual character over earlier RCD No. 001691577-0001.
  • The holder replied that the design showed a solderable PCB terminal block, such components can remain visible in normal use, Article 4(2) did not apply, and the earlier RCD was neutralized by the Article 7(2) grace period.
  • The Division found the seven views consistently depicted one product, the applicant had not proved the component was invisible in normal use, and any visibility restriction for complex products was not established.
  • The earlier RCD was published within twelve months by the same holder and designer, so Article 7(2) applied; the prior design could not defeat individual character, and the invalidity request was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000104219

vs HYTRONIK INTERNATIONAL LTD

2019-08-13Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000104719

vs FIBRAIN Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością

2019-07-30Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000010608

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000010609

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000010606

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000127337

vs Engelbert Theben

2025-10-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)137
000124975

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-08-01Art 25(1)(b)137
000124937

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-07-14Art 25(1)(b)137