DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005239217-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-08-13

000104219

Contested design: 005239217-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 005239217-0001 is rejected. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Plejd AB

Sweden (SE)

Box 11032, 404 21 Göteborg, Sweden

Holder · RCD owner

Hytronik Electronics Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

3/F, Complex Building C, No. 155, Bogang Road South, Bogang Village, Xiaojinkou Town, Huicheng District, Huizhou City, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Cabinet @Mark

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

lighting switches

RCD No 003877356-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2017-05-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, arguing the contested RCD copied its earlier disclosed Community design and produced the same overall impression.
  • The holder argued the common features were standard or functional in electrical connectors and that differences in proportions, lid structure and connector arrangement created a different overall impression.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD, found designer freedom fairly broad, and held the informed user would notice the differences in proportions, lid treatment, connector integration and colour.
  • The invalidity grounds under Article 25(1)(b) CDR were not made out, so the application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000104719

vs FIBRAIN Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością

2019-07-30Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000010606

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000010608

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000010607

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000010609

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000124975

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-08-01Art 25(1)(b)137
000124937

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-07-14Art 25(1)(b)137
000126960

vs Qiu Chen

2025-05-21Art 25(1)(b)137