DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005269842-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-07-30

000104719

Contested design: 005269842-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 005269842-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

xbest.pl Sp. z o.o. Sp. k.

Poland (PL)

Aleje Jerozolimskie street 96, 00-807 Warsaw, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

FIBRAIN Spółka z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnościąvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Zaczernie 190F, 36062 Zaczernie, Poland

Prior art cited (2)

CatalogD1⚠ rejected as evidence

fibre closure design shown in a 3M catalogue page

3M catalogue

CatalogD2⚠ rejected as evidence

fibre closure design shown in the applicant's catalogue

applicant catalogue

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on two earlier fibre-closure designs labelled D1 and D2.
  • The holder argued it had disclosed the contested design in November 2017 within the grace period and that the applicant's disclosure came later.
  • The Division found the catalogue pages, customs clearance and invoice did not objectively prove effective public disclosure of D1 or D2 before 16/05/2018.
  • Because prior disclosure was not proven under Article 7(1) CDR, the invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000104219

vs HYTRONIK INTERNATIONAL LTD

2019-08-13Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000010606

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000010608

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000010607

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000010609

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2019-06-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)138
000124975

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-08-01Art 25(1)(b)137
000124937

vs WAGO Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

2025-07-14Art 25(1)(b)137
000126960

vs Qiu Chen

2025-05-21Art 25(1)(b)137