DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003391481-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-08-27

000106019

Contested design: 003391481-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003391481-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Unforgettable Trading Limited

United Kingdom (GB)

Innovation Warehouse, 1 East Poultry Avenue, London, EC1A 9PT, United Kingdom

Holder · RCD owner

Sinoideas Limitedvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

1202 Room, Baiyida Bld, Taoxia, Gaofeng Rd, Longhua, 518 000 Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

DayClox International Digital Calendar Day Clock shown in a YouTube video

YouTube · disclosed 2014-06-04

Web disclosure

DayClox International Digital Calendar Day Clock shown on the seller website archive

http://dayclox.com · Wayback Machine · disclosed 2014-10-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested digital clock lacked novelty and individual character because the same design had been publicly disclosed and sold before the 24/09/2016 filing date.
  • The applicant relied on a YouTube video published on 04/06/2014 and a Wayback Machine capture of http://dayclox.com archived on 10/10/2014 showing the DayClox International Digital Calendar Day Clock.
  • The holder filed no observations, and the Division accepted the online disclosures as reliable prior art made available to the relevant circles in the EU.
  • The Division found the shared frame, screen, and display layout created the same overall impression, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and had to be invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108