DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004172120-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-09-03

000011147

Contested design: 004172120-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004172120-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

K9-Sport Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Korlátolt Felelősségű Társaság

Hungary (HU)

Ipar utca 10-12, 2310, Szigetszentmiklós, Hungary

Represented by

Norbert András Pataki

Holder · RCD owner

Gábor Bende

Hungary (HU)

József utca 36, 1084, Budapest, Hungary

Represented by

Renáta Hanna Tóth

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

EzyDog dog harness design (a 'Norwegian harness')

YouTube · disclosed 2011-10-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier 'Norwegian harness' designs disclosed online and in catalogues.
  • The holder argued the prior designs were not clearly identified and submitted invoices, catalogues and product photos to support its own harness history.
  • The Division found at least the earlier EzyDog design was sufficiently disclosed before filing through YouTube and corroborating online evidence.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom, the shared three-strap triangular structure dominated the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberKelly BENNETT

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

30.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124016

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124035

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124036

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123279

vs Jure MARKIČ

2024-05-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123434

vs Guangzhou ChongChong E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

2024-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308