DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004022671-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-09-04

000106239

Contested design: 004022671-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 004022671-0001 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004022671-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Pilotfly GmbH

Germany (DE)

Wendelsteinstraße 12, 86163 Augsburg, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Pilotfly Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

Taiwan (TW)

2F-2, No. 118, Sec. 1, Jiafeng S Rd., Zhubei City, Hsinchu County 30271, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

accessories for cameras and cinematographic apparatus

Community design No 003990134-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2017-05-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over its earlier disclosed Community design.
  • Applicant relied on the Office database extract and registration certificate for Community design No 003990134-0001, published before the contested filing date.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier design was disclosed and that the contested protected features were identical, so the contested RCD lacked novelty.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

16.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000119598

vs Shenzhen Chengyimei Cross-border E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2023-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)1610
000113703

vs Enrico Thierbach

2021-07-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)1610
000129117

vs QINGWEI LIU

2026-03-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000130544

vs ShangHai Jheyewear Co.,Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000130342

vs AFFARGO LTD

2026-02-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000125536

vs SHENZHEN AIXIANGPAI E-BUSSINESS CO., LTD

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000124135

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000124085

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168