DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008622203-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-02-07

000125536

Contested design: 008622203-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008622203-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Duoke Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Building 2, East 604, Pingshan Private Enterprise Science and Technology Park, No.65 Lishan Road, Pingshan Community, Taoyuan Street, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Aixiangpai e-Business co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

8A, Block A, Building 2, Huaqiang Plaza, Huaqiang North Road, Futian District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Prior art cited (1)

National design

magnifier

CN 304505382 S · Chinese State Intellectual Property Office · disclosed 2018-02-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier Chinese design filed under application number 201730455544.1 and published before the contested design's filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted publication of Chinese design patent CN 304505382 S on 13/02/2018 as prior disclosure and found the designer's freedom for magnifiers was not severely limited.
  • Shared core features outweighed minor rear-rim and button differences, so the contested design created the same overall impression and lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

16.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129117

vs QINGWEI LIU

2026-03-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000130544

vs ShangHai Jheyewear Co.,Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000130342

vs AFFARGO LTD

2026-02-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000124085

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000124135

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000120389

vs Wenzhou Shengchu Trading Co., Ltd.

2023-06-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000119600

vs Shenzhen Amtang Technology Co., Ltd.

2023-04-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000119598

vs Shenzhen Chengyimei Cross-border E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2023-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168