DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015031514-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-05-30

000124135

Contested design: 015031514-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 015031514-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Patryk Boguszewskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Stefana Batorego 25, 05530 Góra Kalwaria, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Paweł Kośmider

Poland (PL)

Os. Wichrowe wzgórze 30/47, 61-698 Poznań, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon customer-review images of a 'Kyaster Native 1080p Projector' smart projector

https://www.amazon.pl · Amazon.pl · disclosed 2023-02-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested smart-projector design lacked novelty and individual character, relying in particular on earlier Amazon-disclosed images of a Kyaster projector published before the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon review printouts as sufficient internet disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found the prior and contested designs virtually identical in overall impression.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom for projector appearance, the minor differences did not alter the overall impression; the application was upheld and the contested design invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberCristina SENERIO LLOVET

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

16.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129117

vs QINGWEI LIU

2026-03-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000130544

vs ShangHai Jheyewear Co.,Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000130342

vs AFFARGO LTD

2026-02-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000125536

vs SHENZHEN AIXIANGPAI E-BUSSINESS CO., LTD

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000124085

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000120389

vs Wenzhou Shengchu Trading Co., Ltd.

2023-06-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000119600

vs Shenzhen Amtang Technology Co., Ltd.

2023-04-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000119598

vs Shenzhen Chengyimei Cross-border E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2023-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168