DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015052785-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-03-17

000129117

Contested design: 015052785-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015052785-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Feng Wangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Nan'an City, Fujian Province, China

Holder · RCD owner

Qingwen Liuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Yueyang City, Hunan Province, China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

projectors

EU design No 015016439-0001 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2023-04-04

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier EU design No 015016439-0001 for projectors.
  • The applicant argued both designs shared the same cylindrical projector body, side-mounted support, horizontal base, and tiltable structure.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier EU design was validly disclosed before the filing date and that minor detailing differences did not alter the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberGailé SAKALAITE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

16.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130544

vs ShangHai Jheyewear Co.,Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000130342

vs AFFARGO LTD

2026-02-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000125536

vs SHENZHEN AIXIANGPAI E-BUSSINESS CO., LTD

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000124085

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000124135

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000120389

vs Wenzhou Shengchu Trading Co., Ltd.

2023-06-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000119600

vs Shenzhen Amtang Technology Co., Ltd.

2023-04-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000119598

vs Shenzhen Chengyimei Cross-border E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2023-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168