DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009009889-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-04-05

000119600

Contested design: 009009889-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the applicant is ordered to bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 009009889-0001 is declared invalid. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Boarding Ringvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

661 chemin de Chateauvallon, 83190 Ollioules, France

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Amtang Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

2H1601, Yueshanhu, Kangle RD. 88, Longgang, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

pair of 3D glasses with four round lenses

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11oM6Z6p0fo · YouTube · disclosed 2019-03-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on a prior 3D-glasses design disclosed online by 6 March 2019.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not appoint the required EU representative despite an Office invitation.
  • The Division accepted the YouTube disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found the compared glasses produced the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld and the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

16.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129117

vs QINGWEI LIU

2026-03-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000130544

vs ShangHai Jheyewear Co.,Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000130342

vs AFFARGO LTD

2026-02-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000125536

vs SHENZHEN AIXIANGPAI E-BUSSINESS CO., LTD

2025-02-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000124085

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000124135

vs Paweł Kośmider

2024-05-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000120389

vs Wenzhou Shengchu Trading Co., Ltd.

2023-06-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168
000119598

vs Shenzhen Chengyimei Cross-border E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2023-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)168