DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002853366-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-09-13

000105599

Contested design: 002853366-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002853366-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

TJL Trading Limited

United Kingdom (GB)

Burscott Cottage, Burscott Lane, Higher Clovelly, Bideford, Devon, EX39 5RR, United Kingdom

Represented by

Sanderana

Amandeep Rana

Holder · RCD owner

TruSox LLCvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

550 Crain Highway North Unit 1, Glen Bernie, Maryland, MD 21061, United States of America

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAnnex A

earlier sports sock grip-pattern design shown on the holder's website

http://www.trusox.com · TruSox website via Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2012-04-22

Web disclosureAnnex B

YouTube screenshots showing videos of the same earlier sports sock design

YouTube · disclosed 2012-04-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested sock pattern lacked novelty and individual character over earlier online disclosures of the same grip-pattern sock.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted the 2012 website and YouTube disclosures as prior art made available to the public under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Novelty was not proven because one side of the earlier sock was not shown, but the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124695

vs W.R. Lang GmbH

2025-01-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124696

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124718

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126078

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126064

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124755

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328