DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002187997-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-09-27

000103419

Contested design: 002187997-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. Il disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0021879970004 è dichiarato nullo. Il titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dal richiedente, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Park B.V.

Netherlands (NL)

Prof. J.H. Bavincklaan 2, 1183 AT Amstelveen, Olanda

Represented by

Turnstone B.V.

Holder · RCD owner

Union Industries S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via 2 Giugno 1946, 80, 13866 Masserano (BI), Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

non-woven fabrics

RCD No 00419247-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2006-01-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based, inter alia, on earlier RCD No 00419247-0001 showing the same repeating dotted hexagon pattern.
  • The holder argued the informed user would notice the different size, spacing and bonding area of the dots, producing a different visual impression and reflecting functional softness differences.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD was validly disclosed, the author enjoyed broad freedom, and the common repeating hexagonal motif dominated over the minor differences in dot size, spacing and tilt.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6 RDC, so the invalidity application was upheld and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124695

vs W.R. Lang GmbH

2025-01-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124696

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124718

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126078

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126064

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124755

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328