DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005841731-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-12-12

000107059

Contested design: 005841731-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 005841731-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Xudong Zhou

China (CN)

No 8 Group 2, Danitang village, Xialiu town, Hengdong county, Hunan province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Nan Li

Holder · RCD owner

Feng Li

China (CN)

No. 286, Daqing Village, Jiangbei District, Chongqing City, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

wall and ceiling lamps

RCD No 004413144-0003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2017-10-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier RCD No 004413144-0003 published before the contested filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD was properly disclosed and that both designs created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The only visible difference, a hemispherical movement sensor, was treated as functional and insufficient to confer individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000112763

vs Shenzhen Heiman Technology Co., Ltd.

2021-07-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)1010
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108