DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003530757-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-01-08

000106999

Contested design: 003530757-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003530757-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Greg Sach

Germany (DE)

Ubostrasse 34H, 81245 Munich, Germany

Represented by

Sach & Associates

Holder · RCD owner

Shanghai Homepower Industrial Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 518, Litong building Jiudu Road 349, Songjiang District,Shanghai, People's Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Motion Activated LED Toilet Nightlight / toilet lamp

Amazon ASIN B01HGGOTZM · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2016-06-22

Web disclosureD2

Voion auto motion sensor toilet night light

Amazon ASIN B01FIF6DUC · Amazon.com · disclosed 2016-05-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested toilet-light design lacked novelty because identical designs had been disclosed online before the claimed priority date.
  • It relied on Amazon UK and Amazon.com listings, plus Alibaba email and portal confirmations, to show prior public availability of the earlier toilet-light product.
  • The holder filed no observations, facts, or evidence in reply and did not rebut disclosure of prior design D1.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon UK listing for D1 as reliable disclosure under Article 7(1) and found all visible features of the contested RCD present in D1.
  • It held the contested RCD not novel under Article 5, upheld the invalidity application, declared the RCD invalid, and ordered the holder to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE
  • MemberBirgit CESSY FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108