DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002539437-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-01-27

000108681

Contested design: 002539437-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 002539437-0002 wird für nichtig erklärt. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ningbo Beilun Inmax Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 686, Kunlunshan Road Xinqi, Beilun District, Ningbo 315800, Volksrepublik China

Represented by

Wolfram H. Müller

Holder · RCD owner

WERKHAUS Design+Produktion GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Industriestraße 11+13, 29389 Bad Bodenteich, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

"20 FT DRY FREIGHT CONTAINER (24/30 TON RAITINGS), hc." freight container image

econtainer.narod.ru/pages/20ft.html · Internet Archive Wayback Machine · disclosed 2014-08-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested design for an ornament was a standard freight-container side view lacking novelty and at least lacking individual character over earlier container disclosures.
  • It relied on website extracts, especially D1 from the Internet Archive, and compared the contested design with the orange container image shown there.
  • The holder filed no observations; the Division accepted D1 as a prior online disclosure before 17 September 2014 and found the minor differences insufficient to change the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The Division held that the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b), declared it invalid, and ordered the holder to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124695

vs W.R. Lang GmbH

2025-01-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124718

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124696

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126078

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126064

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124755

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328