Invalidity · first instance · 2020-02-04
000107939
Contested design: 005634425-0001
Outcome
The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee will not be refunded.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. 2. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.
CostsNot specified
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Ming Yuvia PDF extraction
United Kingdom (GB)
12 Derby Street Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB3 9, United Kingdom
Holder · RCD owner
Shenzhenshi Lizhi Maoyi Youxian Gongsi
China (CN)
No. 1 Huanan Road, Longgangqu, Huananguoji Yinshuazhipin Baozhuangwuliuqu 3H060a, Shenzhen 518000, People’s Republic of China
Represented by
Prior art cited (1)
RCD No 0055075060001
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity of the contested RCD for lack of novelty and/or individual character over earlier RCD No 0055075060001.
- ›No holder observations are recorded; the decision addresses admissibility rather than the merits.
- ›The Division found the application lacked the required facts, evidence and arguments under Article 28(1)(b)(vi) CDIR despite an invitation to remedy the deficiency.
- ›The application was rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee was not refunded.
Deciding panel
- MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE
- MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
- MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000111061 vs YAYA CHEN | 2021-04-29 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 02 | 7 |
| 000132104 vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd. | 2026-05-21 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 02 | 5 |
| 000127579 vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ | 2026-04-15 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 02 | 5 |
| 000129160 vs ROAD STAR GROUP | 2026-03-17 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 02 | 5 |
| 000131324 vs Song Li | 2026-03-11 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 02 | 5 |
| 000130769 vs CYBROG PTE. LTD. | 2026-02-12 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 02 | 5 |
| 000130811 vs CYBROG PTE. LTD. | 2026-02-12 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 02 | 5 |
| 000130812 vs CYBROG PTE. LTD. | 2026-02-12 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 02 | 5 |