DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004592061-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-02-06

000104379

Contested design: 004592061-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity of the contested RCD is rejected.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 004592061-0001 is rejected.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Vojenský technický ústav, s.p.via PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Mladoboleslavska 944, 197 00 Praha 9 – Kbely, Czech Republic

Represented by

Legal partners, advokátní kancelář s.r.o.

Libor Vašíček

Holder · RCD owner

Zakłady Mechaniczne "TARNÓW" S.A.

Poland (PL)

ul. Kochanowskiego 30, 33-100 Tarnów, Poland

Prior art cited (2)

National designAnnex 2

ANTOS mortar (earlier version)

Czech design registration No 28915 · Czech Industrial Property Office · disclosed 1999-08-04

Utility modelAnnex 4b

60 mm ANTOS mortar

Czech utility model No 30351 · Czech Industrial Property Office · disclosed 2017-02-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)Article 6(1)Article 9Article 25(1)(f)

Argument summary

  • Applicant relied on the ANTOS mortar, Czech registrations, trade-fair and media evidence, and also raised morality, bad-faith, and copyright claims.
  • Holder challenged disclosure, translations, similarity, and the copyright basis.
  • The Division treated morality and bad-faith allegations as inadmissible, accepted disclosure mainly from Czech registration records, but found clear design differences and no identifiable copyright work.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded to the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

22.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000114683

vs Li Ping Kang

2021-06-21Art 25(1)(b)227
000121836

vs AMV Technology s.r.o.

2024-07-12Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)6
000121816

vs AMV Technology s.r.o.

2024-07-12Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)6
000122955

vs Jun Yu

2024-02-26Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)6
000119359

vs TECH LIVING LIMITED

2023-06-12Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)6
000118042

vs Tempo International GmbH

2022-09-14Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)6
000116997

vs Zechuang Zheng

2022-06-22Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)6
000115726

vs Fujian Daocheng Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.

2021-09-09Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)6