DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002874644-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-05-18

000106840

Contested design: 002874644-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0028746440004 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

THEBEN AGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Postfach 56, 72394 Haigerloch, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

WENZHOU ALION ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

NO. 221 Weiershi Road, Yueqing Economic Development Zone, Yueqing, Wenzhou, Yueqing, Wenzhou 325600, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

International designEnclosure 2

ELPA 8 chronometer

DM/058 928 · WIPO Hague Register · disclosed 2002-03-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, arguing the contested chronometer reproduced its earlier ELPA 8 design disclosed long before the filing date.
  • The applicant relied on a 1983 Theben catalog and Hague registration DM/058 928 published on 31 March 2002; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the earlier international design as disclosed under Article 7(1) CDR and found broad designer freedom for chronometers.
  • The shared housing shape and stepped configuration outweighed a minor difference in the receptacles, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108