DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006315289-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-07-16

000111161

Contested design: 006315289-0007

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0063152890007 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Riching Brother Int´l Trading Limitedvia PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

Flat/RM 704, 7/F Bright Way Tower, 33 Mong Kok Road, Mong Kok, Hong Kong, special administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Cabinet Chaillot

Holder · RCD owner

Yanhong Pengvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

2/F, No.11, Chaoyin Street, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, Peoples Republic of China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

bag

https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B0796QDSHB · Amazon.de · disclosed 2018-03-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over prior design D1, an Amazon-listed bag disclosed before the RCD filing date.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure or the applicant’s comparison.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as sufficient disclosure under Article 7 and found high design freedom for backpacks.
  • Because the two bags created the same overall impression on the informed user, the RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038