DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007433206-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-12-11

000111481

Contested design: 007433206-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007433206-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Rimowa GmbH, Intellectual Property Rights Departmentvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Richard-Byrd-Strasse 13, 50829 Köln, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Ningbo Cuiwo Import & Export Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 9-2, No. 329 Kaiming Street Haishu District, Ningbo 315000, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureexhibit 2

Swissmobility Precision suitcase offered on Amazon

ASIN B07 B4H 9DFV · amazon.de · disclosed 2018-02-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on an earlier Swissmobility suitcase disclosed online before the RCD filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not rebut the applicant's disclosure evidence or comparison of overall impressions.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printout as sufficient proof of prior disclosure under Article 7 and found broad design freedom for suitcases.
  • It held that the twin-rib pattern and overall appearance created the same overall impression, so the RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038