DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001913294-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-12-21

000111302

Contested design: 001913294-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0019132940001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

JUMI Sp. z o.o. S.k.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Myśliwska 34A, 95 200 Pabianice, Poland

Represented by

Aleksandra Młoczkowska

Holder · RCD owner

Picture Case (HK) Limitedvia PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

Flat/RM 801, E/F South China Ind Bldg, 1-8 Chun Pin St, Kwai Chung, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAttachment 4

Cazbi Bee children's suitcase from the Cuties & Pals line

http://www.picturecase.co.uk/ · picturecase.co.uk (archived) · disclosed 2011-03-14

Web disclosureAttachment 6

Cazbi Bee children's suitcase offered on Amazon.co.uk

ASIN B00 595 FCRC · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2011-07-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued that the contested children's suitcase lacked novelty and individual character over the earlier 'Cazbi Bee' suitcase disclosed on picturecase.co.uk and Amazon.co.uk before the filing date.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted both internet disclosures, found the compared suitcases shared the same front and side shapes and smiling bee decoration, and treated the wheels and additional handle as functional or minor differences.
  • The contested suitcase produced the same overall impression as the earlier design and was declared invalid for lack of individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M.BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038