DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001913294-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-12-22

000111322

Contested design: 001913294-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0019132940005 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

JUMI Sp. z o.o. S.k.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Myśliwska 34A, 95 200 Pabianice, Poland

Represented by

Aleksandra Młoczkowska

Holder · RCD owner

Picture Case (HK) Limitedvia PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

Flat/RM 801, E/F South China Ind Bldg, 1-8 Chun Pin St, Kwai Chung, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Children's 'Cherry Panda' suitcase design from the 'The Cuties & Pals' line

http://www.picturecase.co.uk/ · picturecase.co.uk; Cambridge Network article; Facebook · disclosed 2010-04-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested children's suitcase lacked novelty and individual character over the earlier 'Cherry Panda' design disclosed online before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and did not contest the applicant's evidence of prior disclosure.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the website, news article and Facebook evidence as reliable proof of disclosure under Article 7 CDR.
  • Comparing the designs, it found the shared panda-shaped appearance dominated minor differences, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit CESSY FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038