DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003764851-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-02-02

000112581

Contested design: 003764851-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 003764851-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Gang Wangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

The two phase of A 2 unit 10 room 02, Jia Zhaoye Center, Huizhou Road No. 11, District of Huicheng, Huizhou City, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

IPEY

David Evans

Holder · RCD owner

Fibar Group S.A.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Serdeczna 3, 62-081 Wysogotowo, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

sensor

RCD No 002157644-0002 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2013-05-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier RCD No 002157644-0002.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been disclosed before filing and that the contested design created the same overall impression despite minor technical differences.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108