DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007297650-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-03-30

000114142

Contested design: 007297650-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007297650-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Wu Yongjinvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 88, 4 Team, Tianmagou Village, Jinjia Town, Shehong County Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

A.BRE.MAR. S.R.L

Holder · RCD owner

Song Yin

China (CN)

No.124 Yinying, Yinying Village, Sangzhuang Town, Dengzhou City, He'nan Province, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Walker Active Paw Protection animal bootees offer

http://www.amazon.de; ASIN B0057G1HF4 · Amazon.de · disclosed 2011-06-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier Amazon-disclosed Walker Active Paw Protection design.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and left the applicant's disclosure and comparison arguments undefended.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing and ASIN evidence as proving disclosure before the RCD filing date under Article 7 CDR.
  • It found the common visual features dominated the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and had to be invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberJessica LEWIS
  • MemberMichelle, Marie DELACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

30.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124016

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124036

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124035

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123279

vs Jure MARKIČ

2024-05-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123434

vs Guangzhou ChongChong E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

2024-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308