DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007229596-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-12

000114203

Contested design: 007229596-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0072295960001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Julius-K9 GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Machtlfinger Str. 26, 81379 München, Germany

Represented by

Norbert András Pataki

Holder · RCD owner

Feiyan Chen

China (CN)

No. 22, Zhuxi Chenjia, Zhanqian Village, Dengpu Town, Yujiang County Yingtan City, Jiangxi Province 335000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

harness

RCD No 0054375060013 · disclosed 2019-03-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested dog harness lacked novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 0054375060013 because the overall shape, connections and colour coincided.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been validly disclosed before the filing date and treated the designer’s freedom for dog harnesses as not limited.
  • The similarities in shape, structure, connections and red-black colour combination outweighed minor differences, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

30.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124016

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124036

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124035

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123279

vs Jure MARKIČ

2024-05-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123434

vs Guangzhou ChongChong E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

2024-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308