DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007991401-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-26

000114161

Contested design: 007991401-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0079914010001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Zuokou Trading Co.,Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

2F, Bldg.A, Shatou Songshan Industrial Park,No. 36,Shazhong Rd., Shajing St., BaoAn, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Mengyue Zhangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Group 1, Xiangjiawan Village, Wu'an Town, Nanzhang County, Hubei Province 441509, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Manuel de Arpe Tejero

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

watch cases, cases for watches

RCD No 0072696180001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-11-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over an earlier RCD for watch cases.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and left the invalidity application undefended on the merits.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD was disclosed before the filing date and that designer freedom for watch cases was only partly constrained.
  • Despite minor side-view differences, the designs created the same overall impression on the informed user, so the contested RCD lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108