DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000363486-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-29

000113025

Contested design: 000363486-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado nº 000363486-0001. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Canalones Novokanal, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle de Huelva, 6 Nave 5, Pol. Ind. La Carrehuela, 28343 Valdemoro (Madrid), España

Represented by

Javier Ungría López

Holder · RCD owner

Canalones Castilla S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle Embalse n°5, 28607 El Álamo (Madrid), España

Prior art cited (1)

CatalogAnexos 2-4

Tarifas de precios de CANALÓN, S.A. de abril de 2004 que muestran el diseño anterior de canalón/bajante

CANALÓN, S.A.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity because the contested gutter design allegedly did not meet the design definition and lacked novelty and individual character over earlier 2004 price-list disclosures.
  • The holder asked for rejection, arguing the design had been authorised, earlier court rulings recognised its rights, and the shape reflected customer-driven technical requirements.
  • The Division held the Article 8 technical-function plea inadmissible because it was raised late, accepted the 2004 CANALÓN price lists as prior disclosure, and found broad designer freedom in this sector.
  • Comparing the overall impressions, the Division found only minor differences from the earlier disclosed profile, concluded the contested design lacked individual character, and invalidated it with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000113026

vs CANALONES CASTILLA S.L.

2021-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)2310
000113061

vs CANALONES CASTILLA S.L.

2021-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)2310
000113027

vs CANALONES CASTILLA S.L.

2021-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)2310
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238