DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000363486-0009

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-29

000113061

Contested design: 000363486-0009

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado nº 000363486-0009. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Canalones Novokanal, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle de Huelva, 6 Nave 5, Pol. Ind. La Carrehuela, 28343 Valdemoro (Madrid), España

Represented by

Javier Ungría López

Holder · RCD owner

Canalones Castilla S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle Embalse n°5, 28607 El Álamo (Madrid), España

Prior art cited (2)

CatalogAnexo 2

Tarifa de precios de CANALÓN, S.A., COBRE, que incluye el diseño anterior de canalón

CANALÓN, S.A.

CatalogAnexo 3

Tarifa de precios de CANALÓN, S.A., ZINC TITATIO, que incluye el diseño anterior de canalón

CANALÓN, S.A.

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on 2004 CANALÓN, S.A. price lists showing an earlier gutter design.
  • The holder asked for rejection, argued the design had long been authorized and commercialized, invoked prior Spanish court judgments, and said its drawings were adapted to customer technical requirements.
  • The Division held the late Article 8 technical-function plea inadmissible, found the 2004 price lists valid prior disclosures outside the grace-period exception, and treated the designer's freedom as broad.
  • Comparing the earlier disclosed gutter profile with the contested design, the Division found only minor curvature and rounding differences and concluded both created the same overall impression on the informed user.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000113026

vs CANALONES CASTILLA S.L.

2021-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)2310
000113027

vs CANALONES CASTILLA S.L.

2021-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)2310
000113025

vs CANALONES CASTILLA S.L.

2021-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)2310
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238