DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007772827-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-05-07

000113101

Contested design: 007772827-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0077728270001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Haisen Livia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No 15 Jiaochang, Xiaogang Town, Dongxiang District, Fuzhou, Jiangxi Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

David Evans

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Diaobo Technology Co., LTDvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Rm. 1201, No 3, Lane 2, Area B, Shangnian Vil., Shangcun Community, Gongming St., Guangming Dist., Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Marcella Clarke

Prior art cited (1)

National design

waist pack design

Chinese design application No 201730491518.4 (registration No 304601482) · DesignView database · disclosed 2018-05-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over an earlier Chinese design disclosed through DesignView before the RCD filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier design and found only minor strap and detail differences that did not alter the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038