DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006576138-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-05-25

000114362

Contested design: 006576138-0002

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicants' costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0065761380002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicants’ costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Luigi Aprilevia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Croce Rossa N.147, 80047 San Giuseppe Vesuviano (NA), Italy

Represented by

Fandip

Francesco Paolo Fumarola

Holder · RCD owner

Creative 7 UK Ltd

United Kingdom (GB)

Creative 7, Miners Road, Llay Industrial Estate Wrexham, LL12 0PJ Wrexham, Wrecsam, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 3

Amazon.it offer for 'Cabin Max Metz' cabin backpack

ASIN B 009 NR5 H86 · Amazon website (www.amazon.it)

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicants sought invalidity of the luggage design, arguing it lacked novelty and individual character and had already been disclosed before filing.
  • Applicants relied on Annex 3 Amazon.it printouts for 'Cabin Max Metz' with ASIN B 009 NR5 H86, stated as first listed in 2013.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as prior disclosure and found only minor differences, insufficient to create a different overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038