DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007733712-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-06-25

000114363

Contested design: 007733712-0006

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and Registered Community design No 0077337120006 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0077337120006 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Luigi Aprilevia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Croce Rossa N. 147, 80047 San Giuseppe Vesuviano (NA), Italy and Via Pace 25/6, 80047 San Giuseppe Vesuviano (NA), Italy

Represented by

Fandip

Francesco Paolo Fumarola

Holder · RCD owner

Creative 7 UK Ltd

United Kingdom (GB)

Creative 7, Miners Road, Llay Industrial Estate Wrexham, LL12 0PJ Wrexham, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 3

screenshots offering the 'Equator 2.0 Backpackers Carry On' cabin backpack

www.cabinmax.com · www.cabinmax.com · disclosed 2014-07-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicants sought invalidity because the contested flight bag had already been disclosed online and lacked novelty and individual character.
  • They relied on Annex 3 screenshots from www.cabinmax.com showing the Equator 2.0 backpack offered online with reviews dated between 2014 and 2016.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and did not contest disclosure or the comparison with the prior design.
  • The Division found Annex 3 proved pre-filing web disclosure and that the contested RCD used exactly the same images as the prior design, so novelty was destroyed.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear the applicants' costs fixed at EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038