DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007496989-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-08-26

000115506

Contested design: 007496989-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007496989-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Savic NVvia PDF extraction

Belgium (BE)

Ringlaan 10, 8501 Heule, Belgium

Represented by

K.O.B. N.V.

Holder · RCD owner

China Machinery Engineering Suzhou Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 659, Jinmen Road, Gusu District Suzhou City, Jiangsu Province, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Ipside

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

Animal excrement collectors

Community design registration No 0052590330006 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-05-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 25(1)(d)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on its earlier RCD for animal excrement collectors.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division held Article 25(1)(d) CDR did not apply because the earlier design had been published before the contested RCD's filing date.
  • The earlier RCD was sufficiently disclosed, designer freedom was high, and the small differences did not change the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld and the contested RCD was declared invalid, with costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

30.11

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129301

vs Yu Bao

2026-01-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129536

vs WENJIU YANG

2025-10-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000129724

vs Shenzhen Xianluo Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-10-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124016

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124035

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000124036

vs EDIESI

2024-09-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123279

vs Jure MARKIČ

2024-05-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308
000123434

vs Guangzhou ChongChong E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

2024-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)308