DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002274266-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-10-27

000114245

Contested design: 002274266-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 002274266-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Gerson Kramervia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Schulstrasse 22, 73568 Durlangen, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Wanzhong Gong

United Kingdom (GB)

1 Farnham Road, Guildford, Surrey GU2 4RG, United Kingdom

Represented by

Mewburn Ellis LLP

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

BV & Jo Waterproof Anti-shock DSLR Camera Case Bag with Extra Rain Cover

ASIN B00 BZH 9HNI · Amazon · disclosed 2008-09-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier Amazon disclosures of a camera case in September 2008.
  • The holder disputed the probative value of Amazon's “date first available”, argued listings and images could be changed, and maintained the contested design remained novel and distinctive.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence for D1, found no concrete proof that the listing had shown a different design, and treated D1 as disclosed on 5 September 2008.
  • Comparing D1 with the contested design, the Division found only minor differences and held that the same overall impression was produced on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038