DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008186084-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-22

000114863

Contested design: 008186084-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008186084-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen LaiTeNingNai Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

710, 710, Bldg. D, Bantian International Center, No. 5, Huancheng South Road, Bantian St., Longgang Dist., People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Maria Ioannides

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Zuokou Trading Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

2F, Bldg. A, Shatou Songshan Industrial Park, No.36 Shazhong Rd., Shajing St., BaoAn Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 3

Amazon offer for a watch case identified as 'Weenarn Compatibile Apple Watch [...]'

ASIN B081DL645N · Amazon.it · disclosed 2019-11-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on an Amazon.it listing showing a similar watch case available from 12 November 2019.
  • Holder argued the Amazon evidence was not translated, designer freedom was limited by smartwatch-fit constraints, and the cited design differed in screen shading and bulkiness.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient disclosure before the filing date and found the missing translation did not prejudice the holder's ability to respond.
  • It held designer freedom was not substantially limited and the differences were minor, so the contested design created the same overall impression as the prior design.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was invalidated in full, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108