DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006656138-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-01-05

000116107

Contested design: 006656138-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006656138-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

David Jan Bauervia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Münchinger Weg 20/2, 71701 Schwieberdingen, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Qinglan Nie

China (CN)

No. 9 Tuqiao Village, Zhangshu City, Jiangxi Province, Yichun, Jiangxi 331200, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Marcella Clarke

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 2

"LIOOBO Abanico" fan offered for sale on Amazon

ASIN B07RN5PYZQ · Amazon.es · disclosed 2019-05-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on an earlier Amazon product listing for a similar fan.
  • The holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as a public disclosure before the filing date and found the prior fan identical apart from immaterial details.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked novelty, so the Division did not examine individual character or other prior designs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038