DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007730635-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-01-25

000116489

Contested design: 007730635-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0077306350001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Abilikey GmbHvia PDF extraction

Switzerland (CH)

Nelkenweg 7, 4323 Wallbach, Switzerland

Holder · RCD owner

Haoqi Mao

China (CN)

No.10, Lane 29, Mingshan Jiangbei Rd., Xikou Town, Fenghua, Zhejiang 315500, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

contour gauge offered by Lanpard on Amazon

ASIN B07W22JDJT · Amazon (amazon.de) · disclosed 2019-08-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested contour gauge lacked individual character because an Amazon-listed Lanpard gauge with ASIN B07W22JDJT had been publicly available before the filing date and created the same overall impression.
  • Holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) and found the designer had broad freedom apart from the lamellas needing to maintain a straight line.
  • The shared body shape, lamella form, and overall configuration outweighed minor differences in colour, surface details, and visible screws, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the design was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to bear the fixed costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108