DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006588737-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-02-21

000115425

Contested design: 006588737-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No. 006588737-0002 is declared invalid; the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 006588737-0002 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Maximilian Janitzvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Blausteinsweg 19, 41472 Neuss, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Sandro Ullering

Germany (DE)

Magdalenenstraße 20, 45889 Gelsenkirchen, Deutschland

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Amazon listing for an Ullermoto motorcycle smartphone holder/pouch

ASIN B079Q4B8HD · amazon.de · disclosed 2018-03-11

Web disclosureD2

Amazon listing for another motorcycle phone holder

ASIN B075HH3MF1 · amazon.de · disclosed 2017-09-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and, at least, lack of individual character, relying mainly on Amazon disclosure D1 and also D2.
  • The holder argued D1's appearance had changed after the relevant date, invoked a different earlier product version, and denied that D1 or D2 destroyed novelty or individual character.
  • The Invalidity Division found the applicant proved D1 was publicly available on amazon.de from 11 March 2018 and the holder's evidence did not rebut that disclosure.
  • Comparing the contested design with D1, the Division found no different overall impression on the informed user, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038