DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006588737-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-02-21

000115463

Contested design: 006588737-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is granted, Registered Community design No 006588737-0003 is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 006588737-0003 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Maximilian Janitzvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Blausteinsweg 19, 41472 Neuss, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Sandro Ullering

Germany (DE)

Magdalenenstraße 20, 45889 Gelsenkirchen, Deutschland

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Ullermoto motorcycle phone holder / smartphone bag, size M

ASIN B079Q4B8HD · amazon.de · disclosed 2018-03-11

Web disclosureD2

older phone-holder design shown on amazon.de

ASIN B075HH3MF1 · amazon.de · disclosed 2017-09-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty or at least individual character, relying on Amazon disclosures D1 and D2 said to predate the contested design's filing date.
  • Holder argued the relevant Amazon listing originally showed a different earlier model D3, so D1's appearance at the filing date was unproven, and also denied that D2 destroyed novelty or individual character.
  • The Division held D3 inadmissible because it changed the subject matter, accepted the Amazon evidence as proving D1 was disclosed on 11 March 2018, and found the holder's rebuttal unsupported.
  • Comparing the contested design with D1, the Division found no different overall impression on the informed user; the application was upheld and the holder ordered to bear EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038