DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008499925-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-03

000116428

Contested design: 008499925-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008499925-0005 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Golden Concept ABvia PDF extraction

Sweden (SE)

Djäknegatan 31, 211 35 Malmö, Sweden

Represented by

Mathias Lindroth

Holder · RCD owner

Changwei LIU

China (CN)

Room 1301, Building B, Olive Oasis Home, No.5, Jingtian East Road, Futian Distirct, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Michele Carella

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

Clock bezels, Cases for watches

RCD No 008468169-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2021-03-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on its earlier RCD for a watch case published before the contested filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD through its Community Designs Bulletin publication and treated the informed user as a watch-casing user with at least average designer freedom.
  • It found the differences minor against the strong similarities, held that the contested design created the same overall impression, and declared it invalid for lack of individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108