DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007203252-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-31

000114482

Contested design: 007203252-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007203252-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Apple Inc.via PDF extraction

United States (US)

One Apple Park Way, Cupertino, California 95014, United States

Holder · RCD owner

Guangzhou Xuanxin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

A101, 2F, No.38, Shengtang St. Industrial Zone, Cen Village, Tianhe Dist., Guangzhou City, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

METIDA

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Apple Watch smartwatch with strap

https://www.apple.com/de ; https://www.apple.com/uk · Internet Archive / apple.com · disclosed 2017-11-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested smartwatch lacked individual character over its earlier Apple Watch design disclosed online before the filing date.
  • The holder challenged disclosure in the European Union and argued that differences in the rim, crown, and colour created a different overall impression.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Internet Archive evidence as prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found broad designer freedom for smartwatch appearance.
  • Comparing the designs as a whole, the Division found their shared shape and configuration outweighed minor colour differences, so the contested design lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108