DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002747600-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-06-08

000115281

Contested design: 002747600-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 002747600-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Nasmed Sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Nowaka Jeziorańskiego 7/184, 03984 Warszawa, Poland

Represented by

Marta Malgorzata Krzyśków-Szymkowicz

Holder · RCD owner

Klinika Flebologii Sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

ul. Wawelska 5, 02-034 Warszawa, Poland

Represented by

Faruga Woźniak i Partnerzy

Adrian Faruga

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

logo/graphic design shown on the applicant website

www.nasmed.com.pl / Internet Archive snapshot · Internet Archive (archive.org) · disclosed 2013-11-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)Article 7(3)

Argument summary

  • Applicant claimed the contested logo design lacked novelty and individual character because an identical design had appeared on its website more than one year before the filing date.
  • Holder disputed the scope of the claims, the reliability and market visibility of the archived webpage, and invoked Articles 7(2) and 7(3) CDR based on the designer's authorization and copyright transfer.
  • The Division accepted the Internet Archive evidence as a reliable online disclosure dated 17 November 2013 and found no proof undermining that disclosure or supporting the abuse defence.
  • Because the prior and contested designs were identical apart from immaterial detail, the contested design lacked novelty and was declared invalid; the remaining ground was not examined.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124695

vs W.R. Lang GmbH

2025-01-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124696

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124718

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126078

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126064

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124755

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328