DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008310619-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-06-09

000117311

Contested design: 008310619-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 008310619-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Fuzhou Esun Electronic Co., LTD.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.3 2F, Juyuanzhou Gulou Industrial Park, Jianxin Town, Cangshan Dist., Fuzhou, Fujian China

Represented by

Cabinet Chaillot

Holder · RCD owner

Qing Fengvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.166, Xinwu Group, Xiatun Village Committee, Yihe Town, Dongyuan/Guangdong, China

Represented by

Lawgical,S.L.P

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

alarm clock

RCD 005941747-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-01-04

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty or, alternatively, lack of individual character, relying on several earlier designs including RCD 005941747-0001.
  • The holder was invited to file observations but did not reply, so the application was undefended.
  • The Division found RCD 005941747-0001 had been validly disclosed before the contested filing date through publication in the Community Designs Bulletin.
  • Comparing the designs from the informed user’s perspective, the Division found only minimal differences and held that the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108