DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007788740-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-06-20

000115886

Contested design: 007788740-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and the contested RCD is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0077887400001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hetaida Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

4F, Baishida High-Tech Park, Xiangdong Industrial Area, Dalinshan Town, Dongguan, Guangdong Province 523000, China

Holder · RCD owner

Top High Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

101B, 102B Building C6, Hengfeng Industrial Park, Hezhou, Xixiang, Bao’an district, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

PatentAnnex 3

digital thermometer design

CN 304116663 S · Chinese patent database · disclosed 2017-04-26

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on Chinese design patent CN 304116663 S published before the filing date.
  • The holder argued the shared features were technically dictated and that added button, handle shape, and colouring gave the contested thermometer a different overall impression.
  • The Division found disclosure of the Chinese patent proven, considered designer freedom only partly constrained, and held that the differences were not significant for the informed user.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR; the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108