DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006645339-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-19

000114843

Contested design: 006645339-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the registered Community design No 006645339-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 006645339-0001 è dichiarato nullo. 3. Il titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Creative 7 UK Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Miners Road, Llay Industrial Estate, Wrexham Wrexham [Wrecsam GB-WRC] LL12 0PJ United Kingdom

Holder · RCD owner

Luigi Aprilevia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Croce Rossa N.147, 80047 San Giuseppe Vesuviano (NA) Italy

Represented by

Francesco Paolo Fumarola

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Cabin Go 5540 carry-on trolley backpack / cabin bag

ASIN B0774YHMXC / MX5540 · amazon.it page corroborated by invoice from Trasformazioni tessili Italia s.r.l. · disclosed 2010-01-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on the earlier Cabin Go design disclosed before the filing date, mainly via an Amazon listing and supporting invoice.
  • Holder disputed the evidence as insufficient for direct comparison, challenged late-filed material, and argued that a crowded trolley-backpack market and functional constraints limited design freedom.
  • The Division accepted disclosure under Article 7 because the Amazon page and invoice matched by code, name, and material, and found the author’s freedom only partly limited.
  • The visible features created the same overall impression on the informed user, so the contested design lacked individual character and was declared invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038