DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008499925-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-26

000116427

Contested design: 008499925-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008499925-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Golden Concept ABvia PDF extraction

Sweden (SE)

Djäknegatan 31, 211 35 Malmö, Sweden

Represented by

Mathias Lindroth

Holder · RCD owner

Changwei LIU

China (CN)

Room 1301, Building B, Olive Oasis Home, No.5, Jingtian East Road, Futian Distirct, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

CO LA Consulting

Michele Carella

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

watch case for Apple Watch

Instagram · disclosed 2020-08-24

Registered RCDD2

Clock bezels, Cases for watches

RCD No 008468169-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2021-03-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested Apple Watch casing was disclosed after its Instagram publication D1 and earlier RCD D2 and lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The holder argued designer freedom was constrained by the Apple Watch shape and that bezel, screw, and speaker-slot differences created a different overall impression.
  • The Division relied on D2 as validly disclosed, found designer freedom at least average, and held the cited differences were minor surface details against strong overall similarity.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR and was declared invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

10.07

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130161

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000130127

vs ALBOR BOGDAN NIEDBAŁA

2026-01-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000127515

vs Changzhou Fengxue Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
0001274582025-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123394

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123355

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123375

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108
000123374

vs Gongjue Brand management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

2025-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)108