DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008795769-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-08-22

000117872

Contested design: 008795769-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0087957690001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Louis Vuitton Malletiervia PDF extraction

France (FR)

2 rue du Pont-Neuf, 75001 Paris, France

Represented by

T Mark Conseils

Holder · RCD owner

Shanxi Youcheng Trading Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 2404, Unit 2, Building 20, Guofenglangyue, Xiaodian District, Taiyuan, China

Represented by

Maria Iakovou Ioannidou

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 5

GAEL online article showing the earlier handbag design

https://www.gael.be/mode/a-peine-sorti-ce-it-bag-est-deja-en-rupture-de-stock-partout · GAEL online magazine · disclosed 2019-10-04

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the contested handbag design lacked novelty and individual character because its earlier bag design had already been disclosed online before the filing date.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the 4 October 2019 GAEL web article as sufficient disclosure of the earlier design under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Comparing the bags, the Division found the same overall impression on the informed user despite minor view and colour differences.
  • The application was upheld and the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038