DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008029615-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-09-22

000116026

Contested design: 008029615-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 008029615-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 008029615-0001 è dichiarato nullo. 3. Il titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Creative 7 UK Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Miners Road, Llay Industrial Estate, Wrexham Wrexham [Wrecsam GB-WRC] LL12 0PJ United Kingdom

Holder · RCD owner

Luigi Aprilevia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Croce Rossa N.147, 80047 San Giuseppe Vesuviano (NA) Italia

Represented by

Francesco Paolo Fumarola

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAllegato A.2 / Allegato A.2.2.2

Cabin Max Universal 2-in-1 cabin bag / backpack

Amazon.co.uk / YouTube · disclosed 2019-09-07

Web disclosureAllegato B⚠ rejected as evidence

Cabin Go MAX 5565 transformable 2-in-1 backpack / shoulder bag

Amazon.it

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier Cabin Max and Cabin Go luggage disclosures online.
  • The holder argued there was no proper design comparison, the shared 2-in-1 feature was technical, and the backpack sector was crowded.
  • The Division accepted the supplementary YouTube evidence for Cabin Max, rejected Amazon.it evidence for Cabin Go MAX as undated, and found the relevant prior design publicly disclosed before filing.
  • Given the author’s not very limited freedom, the common rectangular shape, pocket arrangement, zippers and colour contrast created the same overall impression; the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

03.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131964

vs Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-04-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000129304

vs APRIMONIA Ltd.

2026-03-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130547

vs Rong Hua

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130887

vs Suqi Zhuang

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130221

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130241

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130204

vs WITTCHEN S.A.

2025-12-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038
000130142

vs Edita Avakian

2025-12-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)038