DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002686949-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-09-27

000118537

Contested design: 002686949-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; Registered Community design No 002686949-0002 is declared invalid; the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 002686949-0002 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Intellectual Property MTÜvia PDF extraction

EE

Tartu mnt 67/1-13b, 10115 Tallinn, Estland

Represented by

Agency Arnopatents

Holder · RCD owner

Technische Universität Darmstadt Staatliche Materialprüfungsanstalt Darmstadt Fachgebiet und Institut für Werkstoffkunde

Germany (DE)

Grafenstr. 2, 64283 Darmstadt, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Prior useD1

MPA Darmstadt CERT graphic symbol/logo shown in technical certificates authorising manufacturers to use the sign

Certificates dated 09/02/2006, 18/07/2012 and 12/04/2013 · Staatliche Materialprüfungsanstalt Darmstadt certificates · disclosed 2006-02-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty based on earlier disclosure D1, a logo/sign used in certificates issued since 2006.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the certificates proved disclosure of D1 before the contested design's filing date and found only immaterial differences between the compared signs.
  • Because the contested design lacked novelty under Article 5(1)(b), the application was upheld and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127735

vs CATTELAN ITALIA S.P.A.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000130984

vs qin xi

2026-02-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124695

vs W.R. Lang GmbH

2025-01-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124696

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124718

vs SOG®Systeme GmbH & Co. KG

2025-01-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126078

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000126064

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328
000124755

vs Werner Volker Gumm

2024-06-20REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)328